Difference between revisions of "Chris and censorship"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 56: Line 56:
Chris's views on censorship are skewed at best and hypocritical at worst. His comic is easily the best example of Chris's odd views. Panty-shots, sex scenes, "stripping for [[Women's Rights]]" all of this is easily contrasting to Chris's unwillingness to push the extra mile on violence (especially when it comes to [[Simonla|killing characters]]) and the rampant "bleeping" of cuss words. In fact, Chris's hypocritical actions mimic that of another famed troll-target: David Gonterman, whose misogynistic, homophobic and racist comments and actions clashed with trying to paint a family friendly world. For someone who wants to have his comics published across the world, he's doing a poor job convincing people that he has material that's publishable - [[Chris and art|on top of]] [[Copyright|the rest of the evidence against him]].
Chris's views on censorship are skewed at best and hypocritical at worst. His comic is easily the best example of Chris's odd views. Panty-shots, sex scenes, "stripping for [[Women's Rights]]" all of this is easily contrasting to Chris's unwillingness to push the extra mile on violence (especially when it comes to [[Simonla|killing characters]]) and the rampant "bleeping" of cuss words. In fact, Chris's hypocritical actions mimic that of another famed troll-target: David Gonterman, whose misogynistic, homophobic and racist comments and actions clashed with trying to paint a family friendly world. For someone who wants to have his comics published across the world, he's doing a poor job convincing people that he has material that's publishable - [[Chris and art|on top of]] [[Copyright|the rest of the evidence against him]].


In Chris's eyes, he thinks this is being "TRUE and HONEST", just like everything else. However, because of his [[autism]], he just has no filter for these sort of thing, and because he's such an [[Chris|unmotivated slug]], he's never bothered to learn what's appropriate and what isn't. Thus, we've seen videos where [[CWCFlyingElephants|he's ran around naked]], [[Death threats|threatened violence towards others]], and all around freaked others out.
In Chris's eyes, he thinks this is being "TRUE and HONEST", just like everything else. However, because of his [[autism]], he just has no filter for these sort of thing, and because he's such an [[Chris|unmotivated slug]], he's never bothered to learn what's appropriate and what isn't. Thus, we've seen videos where [[CWCFlyingElephants|he's run around naked]], [[Death threats|threatened violence towards others]], and all around freaked others out.


{{Chris and}}
{{Chris and}}


[[Category:Chris-chan]]
[[Category:Chris-chan]]

Revision as of 06:17, 29 April 2010

Great Director Chandler is fond of censorship.

As a result of his massive ego, Chris is very insecure about others' opinions regarding him and his work. This has led to him censoring out various comments and remarks from trolls and innocent bystanders alike.

Origins

In the Mailbag, Chris's desire for censorship stems from his belief that it is the "Letters to the Editor" section of his website. From what media he's been exposed to, he has deduced that all letters to the editor must unconditionally praise him. Chris believes that such behavior is commonplace, as he accused Alec Benson Leary of doing the same thing in his Mailbags. He is unaware that it makes him look like an insecure tyrant.

Manifestations

In the comics

Chris has been censoring events since Issue 0 of the comic. Before his encounters with the trolls the majority of censorship in the comic has been indirect, recreating heavily distorted versions of real events in an attempt to make him look more sympathetic and heroic. It's not until the trolls began to pester him that other forms of censorship begin to emerge and eventually take over the comic.

Chris has a consistent standard as to what he censors: swear words and what people tell him to censor. While early Sonichu comics have extremely bizarre and strange minced oaths, more recent issues have added actual swearing, which has been clumsily censored out. This goes for anything from "fuck," which is understandable, to extremely mild almost-swears like "crap" which TV-Y7 shows can get away with anyway. Chris obviously has no problem with even the worst swearing, so we can assume he's doing it for the sake of the children reading the comic. Which is really strange, because he could just as easily have used harmless expletives like "Darn", and he has never voluntarily removed other objectionable content from his comic, such as:

Presumably, if he was left to his own devices, Chris would have no problem exposing his hypothetical 7-year-old-and-up audience to "sexy" anatomy lessons.

Notably, the comic contains and has not yet censored:

  • Extremely graphic mutilation and murder of real people, namely the Asperpedia staff. This has not been censored yet, even after the people he proxy-murdered complained.
  • Profoundly racist and homophobic rants, some of which are integral plot elements.
  • PG-13-level sexual imagery and pseudo-innuendo, which remains even after the graphic sex was taken out.
  • Unpleasantly frank discussions of sex in general, even if it now takes place offscreen.

You know, nothing that would be out of place on an episode of Power Rangers or Pokemon.

On his website

The censorship for Chris's website is even more thorough and entrenched than in the comic. Like in the comic, he censors any swear word, regardless of how mild it is, while leaving every other horrible thought that comes out of his head unedited. The only thing Chris likes to edit are other peoples' words.

Perhaps the most disturbing censorship comes with the mailbag. It didn't take long for Chris to start gutting the mailbag, first simply depositing questions he didn't want to answer in the "rejected" mailbag, then planting rejected letters into the "to be answered later" mailbag when called out on rejecting letters, then straight-up erasing letters from the page in hopes nobody would figure out they existed. The most insidious edits (as far as Chris can achieve insidiousness) are his editing of questions and letters, in varying degrees of severity. Usually, this is to bring letters in line with his self-serving moral standards, to remove opinions he disagrees with, to turn criticism of his comic into fawning, to turn approval of Asperchu into approval of Sonichu, or just to try and make his latest stupid point as hard as he can.

Interestingly, he is quite fond of striking out and replacing parts of letters with bold text, like a child scribbling over something he doesn't like. It's unknown whether he expects people to ignore the stricken parts of the letter, to agree with his righteous fury, or if it's just for tantrum-like emphasis. He does the same thing when editing his ED page, so perhaps he just assumes we're all on his side.

Chris has an unpleasant tendency to refer to himself as the captain of the CWCipedia, and the trolls as assorted foes trying to bring him down. His actual level of control is of course negligible, so regardless of how disturbingly tyrannical his actions seem, he is so completely incompetent we should be glad he's not any smarter or in anything even vaguely resembling a position of power.

Self-censorship

When it comes to Chris censoring himself, it's a difficult thing to actually pin down. It can be said that Chris has learned to put a filter on himself.

During Chris's early net days, nothing was too candid for Chris to mention. His attraction signs, telling people that he was a virgin with rage and he was searching for a boyfriend-free girl to build into a sweetheart - all of it was fair game. However, his troll attacks has started to teach him that not everything can and should be said. Of course, with Chris, trying to get him to stop mentioning things is akin to smacking a dog with a newspaper when it does something bad - you have to keep doing it over and over just to get him to learn.

Case in point: The Wallflower incident. When the Wallflower was exposed to the world, the girl approached the CWCki to get the page removed, a request with which the site complied. However, Chris not only took it as a victory for himself, he would STILL drop her name - both real AND pen - even a month after it was done. Even more, when Chris snatched the article for the Wallflower from the CWCki and placed it on the CWCipedia, Chris removed the part that described how the CWCki was respectful to the Wallflower's privacy.

Chris' views on censorship

Chris's views on censorship are skewed at best and hypocritical at worst. His comic is easily the best example of Chris's odd views. Panty-shots, sex scenes, "stripping for Women's Rights" all of this is easily contrasting to Chris's unwillingness to push the extra mile on violence (especially when it comes to killing characters) and the rampant "bleeping" of cuss words. In fact, Chris's hypocritical actions mimic that of another famed troll-target: David Gonterman, whose misogynistic, homophobic and racist comments and actions clashed with trying to paint a family friendly world. For someone who wants to have his comics published across the world, he's doing a poor job convincing people that he has material that's publishable - on top of the rest of the evidence against him.

In Chris's eyes, he thinks this is being "TRUE and HONEST", just like everything else. However, because of his autism, he just has no filter for these sort of thing, and because he's such an unmotivated slug, he's never bothered to learn what's appropriate and what isn't. Thus, we've seen videos where he's run around naked, threatened violence towards others, and all around freaked others out.

Chris and...

Body: DrugsFashionGenderHealthNutritionSex

Psyche: CopingManipulationMental healthcareNostalgiaReality

Personality: AngerEgoHypocrisyKindnessNegligencePersonalityRemorseStress

Expression: ArtCensorshipEnglishLanguageMusicOratorySpanishWriting

Society: ContestsDeathThe LawPoliticsPornographyRaceReadingReligionSexualitySocializationSports

Business: Brand loyaltyBusinessCopyrightMoneyNegotiationWork

Technology: CamerasElectronicsThe InternetScienceTelevisionVideo Games