Difference between revisions of "Laughs Under Lucricities"
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
'''Laughs Under Lucricities''', also referred to as '''Laughs Under Lucrativeness''', is a [[Wikipedia:backronym|backronym]] [[Chris]] coined for the ubiquitous internet slang "[[Wiktionary:lulz|lulz]]." Broadly, Laughs Under Lucricities refers to any humor generated at Chris's expense and therefore completely reprehensible as far as the latter is concerned. | '''Laughs Under Lucricities''', also referred to as '''Laughs Under Lucrativeness''', is a [[Wikipedia:backronym|backronym]] [[Chris]] coined for the ubiquitous internet slang "[[Wiktionary:lulz|lulz]]." Broadly, Laughs Under Lucricities refers to any humor generated at Chris's expense and therefore completely reprehensible as far as the latter is concerned. | ||
The term is a prime example of just how tenuous a grasp Chris has over the [[English language]], given that even if "lucricities" were a word, the phrase would still make little sense in isolation. Besides, it's inaccurate, as [[trolls]] don't actually make money on their schemes, unless they're lucky enough to get Cosimo di Medici to sponsor them. Nonetheless, given the context in which it was used (see | The term is a prime example of just how tenuous a grasp Chris has over the [[English language]], given that even if "lucricities" were a word, the phrase would still make little sense in isolation. Besides, it's inaccurate, as [[trolls]] don't actually make money on their schemes, unless they're lucky enough to get Cosimo di Medici to sponsor them. Nonetheless, given the context in which it was used (see above quote) and Chris's considerable history of suffering at the hands of the internet, the meaning of this garbled [[CWC-ism]] rings surprisingly clear. | ||
A related term is "lucrid", a word Chris has used variously, despite that fact that it is nowhere to be found in any formal dictionary. It is seemingly a combination of 'lucid' and 'lucrative' but falls short of being a portmanteau since in context it implies qualities of neither word. Its application suggests that Chris [[slow-in-the-minds|mistakenly]] uses it in place of the word 'lewd' or similar term of contempt. | A related term is "lucrid", a word Chris has used variously, despite that fact that it is nowhere to be found in any formal dictionary. It is seemingly a combination of 'lucid' and 'lucrative' but falls short of being a portmanteau since in context it implies qualities of neither word. Its application suggests that Chris [[slow-in-the-minds|mistakenly]] uses it in place of the word 'lewd' or similar term of contempt. | ||
Revision as of 08:52, 31 January 2010
| “ | ... your bully of a boyfriend is the Original Author of the "Chris-chan" page that was put up there for the "LULZ", "Laughs Under Lucricities". Which I don't have to tell you is not only mean and cruel, the page is HORRIBLE | ” |
| Chris-Chan, graciously translating his own disorientating spacker-speak for Kathleen. | ||
Laughs Under Lucricities, also referred to as Laughs Under Lucrativeness, is a backronym Chris coined for the ubiquitous internet slang "lulz." Broadly, Laughs Under Lucricities refers to any humor generated at Chris's expense and therefore completely reprehensible as far as the latter is concerned.
The term is a prime example of just how tenuous a grasp Chris has over the English language, given that even if "lucricities" were a word, the phrase would still make little sense in isolation. Besides, it's inaccurate, as trolls don't actually make money on their schemes, unless they're lucky enough to get Cosimo di Medici to sponsor them. Nonetheless, given the context in which it was used (see above quote) and Chris's considerable history of suffering at the hands of the internet, the meaning of this garbled CWC-ism rings surprisingly clear.
A related term is "lucrid", a word Chris has used variously, despite that fact that it is nowhere to be found in any formal dictionary. It is seemingly a combination of 'lucid' and 'lucrative' but falls short of being a portmanteau since in context it implies qualities of neither word. Its application suggests that Chris mistakenly uses it in place of the word 'lewd' or similar term of contempt.
See also
|
This article, like Chris's pickle, is a bit small. You can help CWCki by expanding it. |