Difference between revisions of "September 2026 social media posts"
Ayumu Kasuga (talk | contribs) |
Ayumu Kasuga (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 93: | Line 93: | ||
<nowiki>youtu.be/jeX4MV0EmbI?is=eifoVyu37-ljlvOz</nowiki>}} | <nowiki>youtu.be/jeX4MV0EmbI?is=eifoVyu37-ljlvOz</nowiki>}} | ||
{{quoteboxgreen|speaker=Lucifur|If you really want me to stop being repetitive then actually engage with your audience outside of superchats there is a great reason it's primarily made up of weens and observers and not actual fans and it's because you actively disregard them and take advantage of them for money}} | |||
{{quoteboxgreen|but oh my oh me if I were to reply to non paying comments they'd stop giving me money for legos and transformers toys. Vro most streamers reply to comments vert frequently and still receive donations probably more than you because they actually work to build up and maintain an audience}} | |||
{{quoteboxorange|speaker=Philip Paymo|Maybe the reason she doesn't often respond to regular comments is because 80% of the comment section is people insulting her or trying to take advantage of her. That's the reason I signed up to moderate, to try and fix that issue so eventually the comment section is worth something again.}} | |||
{{quoteboxorange|There are obviously normal people with good intentions in the comments, and we appreciate all of them, but when there's such a flood of people who aren't engaging in good faith, it can be very difficult to sift through it. Until we do so consistently enough where we can reasonably trust them,}} | |||
{{quoteboxorange|there has to be [[Money|some way to verify that you're engaging in good faith]], or at least that it's more likely than not. I apologize if you really were engaging in good faith and we weren't able to trust it. To be honest, though, from the way you're engaging now, I think it's very unlikely that you are.}} | |||
{{quoteboxorange|I hope someday this isn't an issue and there can be a strong and trusting community around her work at large, but sadly, the way things have panned out, there's some work we have to do to get there. I appreciate the trust she and most of the community have placed in me, and I hope to live up to it.}} | |||
Chris liked the above four posts by Paymo. | |||
==JCWCSP Cameo Q&A== | ==JCWCSP Cameo Q&A== | ||
| Line 117: | Line 127: | ||
{{quoteboxorange|speaker=Phil Paymo|time=6:28 PM|We talked further and she tried to share what was clearly meant to be a private e-mail with me that you sent her, so I guess that answers the question. I blocked her, and I suggest you keep an eye on her in the future.}} | {{quoteboxorange|speaker=Phil Paymo|time=6:28 PM|We talked further and she tried to share what was clearly meant to be a private e-mail with me that you sent her, so I guess that answers the question. I blocked her, and I suggest you keep an eye on her in the future.}} | ||
{{quoteboxred|speaker=N/A|[''Post not found'']}} | |||
{{quoteboxorange|speaker=Phil Paymo|time=7:36 PM|You have no expectation of privacy when you're violating someone else's behind their back.}} | |||
{{quoteboxred|speaker=N/A|[''Post not found'']}} | |||
{{quoteboxorange|speaker=Phil Paymo|time=7:46 PM|If you don't want me to "expose" you, don't do something that needs to be exposed in the first place.}} | |||
{{quoteboxorange|speaker=Phil Paymo|time=7:49 PM|I would've been more than happy to trust you if you acted like someone worth trusting. I wish you were, and I genuinely don't understand what made you think it was okay to send something like that unprompted.}} | |||
{{quoteboxred|speaker=N/A|[''Post not found'']}} | |||
{{quoteboxorange|speaker=Phil Paymo|time=7:55 PM|I have no intentions of "getting close with her" because I want to learn about private information. To any extent I'm "close" with Christine, it's because I'm happy to help her with her work and I like occasionally shooting the breeze with her as a friend. The fact that you see her like someone to}} | |||
{{quoteboxorange|"win over" like that is frankly disturbing to me, and tells me a lot more about your intentions than anything else ever could. I can absolutely impose too much at times or get too parasocial, but I recognize that as my own flaw to work on, it's not my goal like it apparently is for you.}} | |||
{{quoteboxorange|The fact that you're still demonizing her for things she hasn't done in years at this point also says a lot.}} | |||
{{Social media}} | {{Social media}} | ||
[[Category:Chris-chan social media posts, 2026| 09]] | [[Category:Chris-chan social media posts, 2026| 09]] | ||
Revision as of 14:42, 9 September 2026
This page is an archive of Chris's social media posts during September 2026. Unless otherwise indicated, the posts are on 𝕏 from the account @CPU_CWCSonichu and on Bluesky from the account @cpujcwcsprime.bsky.social and all time stamps are Eastern Time Zone (ET).
A Tribute to Peter Cullen
5 September
9:20 AM
Posted to Chris's Bluesky, then Twitter one minute later.
| A bit late, but I wanted to honor Peter Cullen. I started recording on August 27, 2026.
Til All Are One! #hasbro #petercullen [Posts link to A Tribute to Peter Cullen from JCWCSP.] |
I've been busy
5 September
10:16 PM
Posted to Chris's Bluesky.
| [Replying to an earlier post]
Mrs. CPU Jesus Christ Chan Sonichu Chan, may you divulge the reason behind this sudden lull in posting? |
| I've been busy. |
Cullen will return with the merge
6 September
10:24 PM
Posted to Chris's Twitter.
| [Replying to the previous post]
Will he come back with the dimensional merge? |
| 👍🏻 |
RIP Tim Curry too
6 September
10:29 PM
Posted to Chris's Twitter.
| [Replying to an earlier post]
Notice that this literal mother fucker said nothing about the GLORIOUS Tim Curry. |
| Tim Curry's a good man as well. I was focused on Peter. I know Tim voiced Princess Sally's father. |
| You are not a good man. You sexually assaulted your own mother, you manipulated those around you to feel pity for you rather than her. Your case actually sets up precedent in the Commonwealth to not believe victims of assault. You have single-handedly set women back decades. |
Undecided on Sonic OCs
6 September
10:30 PM
Posted to Chris's Twitter.
| [Replying to an earlier post]
What are your thoughts on lord x and 2011x |
| Not a fan nor a hater; I don't like this image, and I am neutral about it, because I don't know anything about it. |
| wdym you don't like this image huhhh. wait. you're THE CHRIS CHAN?? |
Agreeing with Paymo banning spammer
6 September
9:50 PM
Posted to Chris's Bluesky.
| [Replying to an earlier post]
It would appear your mod has banned me from commenting for asking about the morrowind could you ask him not to ban me for asking about the morrowind |
| I banned you because you were spamming. |
| No I wasn't you dick I ask about the chris chan morrowind stream every video spamming is when you post rapidly in short succession something like some ween rapidly spelling out the n word in chat over and over again is spam what I'm doing isn't spam |
| Actually, I agree with Philip. It is spamming, because you did it on repeat. I am not a fan of those who repeat something like it is the "freshest meme on the block". Plus, I am busy with life and my projects, so unless I actually feel like it, it's a "no" to your question. |
| Plus, I'm even less interested, because of the repetitive mentioning and requesting.
You can take a lesson from #LightningBliss in her Blissy Idea, Loppy Idea series. youtu.be/jeX4MV0EmbI?is=eifoVyu37-ljlvOz |
| If you really want me to stop being repetitive then actually engage with your audience outside of superchats there is a great reason it's primarily made up of weens and observers and not actual fans and it's because you actively disregard them and take advantage of them for money |
| but oh my oh me if I were to reply to non paying comments they'd stop giving me money for legos and transformers toys. Vro most streamers reply to comments vert frequently and still receive donations probably more than you because they actually work to build up and maintain an audience |
| Maybe the reason she doesn't often respond to regular comments is because 80% of the comment section is people insulting her or trying to take advantage of her. That's the reason I signed up to moderate, to try and fix that issue so eventually the comment section is worth something again. |
| There are obviously normal people with good intentions in the comments, and we appreciate all of them, but when there's such a flood of people who aren't engaging in good faith, it can be very difficult to sift through it. Until we do so consistently enough where we can reasonably trust them, |
| there has to be some way to verify that you're engaging in good faith, or at least that it's more likely than not. I apologize if you really were engaging in good faith and we weren't able to trust it. To be honest, though, from the way you're engaging now, I think it's very unlikely that you are. |
| I hope someday this isn't an issue and there can be a strong and trusting community around her work at large, but sadly, the way things have panned out, there's some work we have to do to get there. I appreciate the trust she and most of the community have placed in me, and I hope to live up to it. |
Chris liked the above four posts by Paymo.
JCWCSP Cameo Q&A
7 September
2:36 PM
Posted to Chris's Bluesky.
| @philippaymo.bsky.social compiled this short Q&A for me. Thank you. ⚡️💙⚡️ [Posts link to JCWCSP Cameo Q&A.] |
| Thank you for the credit! It was a pleasure to work on this! |
Chris liked the above post.
Paymo warns Chris against another orbiter
7 September
Philip Paymo replies to Chris's previous post but gets no public reply from him.
| Do you mind if I ask for your input on whether @ajlsonichu.bsky.social is trustworthy? She messaged me earlier today saying she's talked with you before and she seems fine from my talking to her, but I just want to make sure there's no bad history there before I continue talking with her to be safe. |
| We talked further and she tried to share what was clearly meant to be a private e-mail with me that you sent her, so I guess that answers the question. I blocked her, and I suggest you keep an eye on her in the future. |
| [Post not found] |
| You have no expectation of privacy when you're violating someone else's behind their back. |
| [Post not found] |
| If you don't want me to "expose" you, don't do something that needs to be exposed in the first place. |
| I would've been more than happy to trust you if you acted like someone worth trusting. I wish you were, and I genuinely don't understand what made you think it was okay to send something like that unprompted. |
| [Post not found] |
| I have no intentions of "getting close with her" because I want to learn about private information. To any extent I'm "close" with Christine, it's because I'm happy to help her with her work and I like occasionally shooting the breeze with her as a friend. The fact that you see her like someone to |
| "win over" like that is frankly disturbing to me, and tells me a lot more about your intentions than anything else ever could. I can absolutely impose too much at times or get too parasocial, but I recognize that as my own flaw to work on, it's not my goal like it apparently is for you. |
| The fact that you're still demonizing her for things she hasn't done in years at this point also says a lot. |
